Xeon E5-2689 v4 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
21.75
+97.4%
Xeon E5-2689 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
11.02

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Xeon E5-2689 v4 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking236685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.38
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3Intel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameno dataBroadwell (2014−2019)
Release date30 October 2023 (less than a year ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,723

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.748 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus supportno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
L2 cacheno data2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data25 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data52 °C
Number of transistors92000 Million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data1,536 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.75 11.02
Recency 30 October 2023 20 June 2016
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 165 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 97.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 60% more physical cores, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 111.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2689 v4, on the other hand, has 25% more threads.

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2689 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2689 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E5-2689 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4
Xeon E5-2689 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 220 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 181 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2689 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or Xeon E5-2689 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.