Xeon 6774P vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6774P outperforms M3 Max 16-Core by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 316 | 26 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.79 | 7.79 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 April 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 336 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 6774P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 136 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.10 | 65.88 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 1 April 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 64 |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 350 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has 349% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6774P, on the other hand, has a 173% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6774P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon 6774P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
