Xeon 2.8 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking285not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency12.76no data
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataPaxville (2002−2005)
Release date30 October 2023 (2 years ago)September 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 2.8: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.748 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cacheno data512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography3 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data217 mm2
Number of transistors92000 Million200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 2.8 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno data604
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 2.8. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 135 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 4233% more advanced lithography process, and 73% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Intel Xeon 2.8. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon 2.8 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 319 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 2.8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon 2.8, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.