Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a whopping 5362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 194 | 2934 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | 2x AMD Turion Ultra |
| Power efficiency | 31.36 | 1.28 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Puma (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.67 | 0.47 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 4 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 5361.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, on the other hand, has 122.9% lower power consumption.
The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
