Pentium M 705 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Pentium M 705 by a whopping 16743% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 285 | 3636 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | Pentium M |
| Power efficiency | 12.76 | 0.24 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
M3 Max 16-Core and Pentium M 705 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.956V-1.484V |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Pentium M 705 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Pentium M 705. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
M3 Max 16-Core and Pentium M 705 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Pentium M 705 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.58 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 24 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 16743% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 4233% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 705, on the other hand, has 225% lower power consumption.
The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 705 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
