i7-13700E vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.87
+18.3%
Core i7-13700E
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
21.86

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Core i7-13700E by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking193241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency31.3931.83
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed2.748 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1700
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.87
+18.3%
i7-13700E 21.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41091
+18.3%
i7-13700E 34728

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.87 21.86
Recency 30 October 2023 4 January 2023
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 65 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 18.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

i7-13700E, on the other hand, has 50% more threads, and 20% lower power consumption.

The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-13700E in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Core i7-13700E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core i7-13700E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Core i7-13700E
Core i7-13700E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Core i7-13700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or Core i7-13700E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.