Celeron N4020 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core threads, 78 Watt
21.84
+2084%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 2084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2242370
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3Intel Gemini Lake
Architecture codenameno dataGemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date30 October 2023 (less than a year ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$236

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1612 x 4.1  GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7  GHz Apple M3 E-Core2
Base clock speed2.748 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2.8 GHz
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 21.84
+2084%
Celeron N4020 1.00

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Celeron N4020 by 2084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 3264
+2468%
Celeron N4020 127

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Celeron N4020 by 2468% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 271
+267%
Celeron N4020 74

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Celeron N4020 by 267% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.84 1.00
Recency 30 October 2023 4 November 2019
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 6 Watt

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 196 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1592 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.