Atom Z2760 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Primary details
Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 188 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 31.32 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cloverview (2012) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 27 September 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 65 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FC-MB4760 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2.4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 27 September 2012 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 3 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z2760, on the other hand, has 2500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z2760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
