Xeon Silver 4516Y vs Apple M2
Primary details
Comparing Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 807 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 44.48 | no data |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 45 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 24 |
| Threads | 8 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 185 Watt |
Apple M2 has 825% lower power consumption.
Xeon Silver 4516Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4516Y is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Xeon Silver 4516Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
