Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
8.47
+630%
Xeon E7-8890 v4
2016, $7,174
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
1.16

M2 outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10122559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Xeon E7
Power efficiency45.410.75
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataBroadwell (2015−2019)
Release date10 June 2022 (3 years ago)20 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data3 × 9.6 GT/s
L1 cache2 MBno data
L2 cache20 MB6 MB
L3 cacheno data60 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data8 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data3 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M2 8.47
+630%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+627%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.47 1.16
Recency 10 June 2022 20 June 2016
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 165 Watt

Apple M2 has a 630.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 725% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8890 v4, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 750 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 33 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M2 and Xeon E7-8890 v4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.