Xeon 6970E+ vs Apple M2
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1116 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.94 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Clearwater Forest (2026) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (4 years ago) | 31 May 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 and Xeon 6970E+: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 192 |
| Threads | 8 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | no data | 480 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and Xeon 6970E+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 7529 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and Xeon 6970E+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M2 and Xeon 6970E+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and Xeon 6970E+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Xeon 6970E+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Xeon 6970E+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 31 May 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 192 |
| Threads | 8 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 400 Watt |
Apple M2 has 1900% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6970E+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Intel Xeon 6970E+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6970E+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
