Phenom II X6 1045T vs Apple M2
Aggregate performance score
M2 outperforms Phenom II X6 1045T by a whopping 359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1018 | 2184 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.29 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 45.37 | 2.08 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Thuban (2010) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 September 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $175 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
M2 and Phenom II X6 1045T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 346 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | 904 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and Phenom II X6 1045T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 95 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Phenom II X6 1045T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Phenom II X6 1045T.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.45 | 1.84 |
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 1 September 2010 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 95 Watt |
Apple M2 has a 359.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 375% lower power consumption.
The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X6 1045T in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1045T is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
