Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
8.47
+9.1%

M2 outperforms Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10181093
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency17.99no data
DesignerAppleno data
Architecture codenameno data4x Cortex-X925,, A720
Release date10 June 2022 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

M2 and Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3.62 GHz
L1 cache2 MBno data
L2 cache20 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nmno data
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)20 WattW

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M2 8.47
+9.1%
Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 7.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+9.1%
Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 13691
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.47 7.76

Apple M2 has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M2 and Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910
Kompanio Ultra 910

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 758 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M2 and Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.