EPYC 9334 vs Apple M2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.40
EPYC 9334
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 210 Watt
40.82
+334%

EPYC 9334 outperforms Apple M2 by a whopping 334% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M2 and EPYC 9334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking81462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.52
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency44.4518.38
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,990

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M2 and EPYC 9334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache2 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache20 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data4x 72 mm2
Number of transistors20000 Million52,560 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M2 and EPYC 9334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and EPYC 9334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and EPYC 9334 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and EPYC 9334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and EPYC 9334.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.40
EPYC 9334 40.82
+334%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
EPYC 9334 64841
+334%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 40.82
Recency 10 June 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 8 64
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 210 Watt

Apple M2 has 950% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9334, on the other hand, has a 334.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The EPYC 9334 is our recommended choice as it beats the M2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9334 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and EPYC 9334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
AMD EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 621 vote

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M2 or EPYC 9334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.