Ultra 7 258V vs Apple M2

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.40
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.41
+32%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Apple M2 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking806613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency44.4869.09
Architecture codenameno dataLunar Lake (2024)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache2 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.40
Ultra 7 258V 12.41
+32%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
Ultra 7 258V 19710
+32%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M2 1215
Ultra 7 258V 1593
+31.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M2 223
Ultra 7 258V 270
+21.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 12.41
Recency 10 June 2022 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 258V has a 32% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 601 vote

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.