Celeron N2830 vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 and Celeron N2830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking862not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameno dataBay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current priceno data$234 (2.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz2.41 GHz
L1 cache2 MB56K (per core)
L2 cache20 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Connectno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Apple M2 and Celeron N2830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 and Celeron N2830 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M2 and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 and Celeron N2830.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Apple M2 14933
+2620%
Celeron N2830 549

Apple M2 outperforms Celeron N2830 by 2620% in Passmark.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Apple M2 1215
+1713%
Celeron N2830 67

Apple M2 outperforms Celeron N2830 by 1713% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Apple M2 223
+487%
Celeron N2830 38

Apple M2 outperforms Celeron N2830 by 487% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2022 23 February 2014
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Celeron N2830. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Celeron N2830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 505 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 207 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 or Celeron N2830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.