Athlon II X4 620e vs Apple M2
Aggregate performance score
M2 outperforms Athlon II X4 620e by a whopping 668% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1046 | 2643 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.99 | 1.04 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Propus (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (3 years ago) | 3 May 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M2 and Athlon II X4 620e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | 300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and Athlon II X4 620e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Athlon II X4 620e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Athlon II X4 620e.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.52 | 1.11 |
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 3 May 2011 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
Apple M2 has a 667.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.
The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II X4 620e in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 620e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
