A9-9400 SoC vs Apple M2
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1052 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.00 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | no data | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (3 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 and A9-9400 SoC: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and A9-9400 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and A9-9400 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and A9-9400 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and A9-9400 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | Radeon R5 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and A9-9400 SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 10 Watt |
Apple M2 has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
A9-9400 SoC, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and AMD A9-9400 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while A9-9400 SoC is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
