Xeon W-1290E vs Apple M2 Pro
Aggregate performance score
M2 Pro outperforms Xeon W-1290E by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 713 | 842 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.89 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.93 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 13 May 2020 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $552 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 3.3 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 206 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 40000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | W | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Pro and Xeon W-1290E.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.54 | 11.10 |
| Recency | 17 January 2023 | 13 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 10 |
| Threads | 12 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Apple M2 Pro has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 20% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon W-1290E, on the other hand, has 67% more threads.
The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-1290E in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M2 Pro is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1290E is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
