Processor N250 vs Apple M2 Pro
Aggregate performance score
M2 Pro outperforms Processor N250 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 713 | 1847 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.87 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 7 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 Pro and Processor N250: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 3.3 MB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 40000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Pro and Processor N250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | W | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Pro and Processor N250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M2 Pro and Processor N250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Pro and Processor N250 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Pro and Processor N250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Pro and Processor N250.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.54 | 3.11 |
| Recency | 17 January 2023 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Apple M2 Pro has a 303% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N250 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
