Ultra 5 245KF vs Apple M2 Pro
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms M2 Pro by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 761 | 295 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 51.49 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.29 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 24 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $294 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 6 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 3.3 MB | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | no data | 243 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 40000 Million | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | W | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245KF.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.86 | 25.24 |
| Recency | 17 January 2023 | 24 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 14 |
| Threads | 12 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
Ultra 5 245KF has a 96% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 17% more physical cores and 17% more threads, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Pro in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M2 Pro is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
