5 320 vs Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
Aggregate performance score
M2 Pro 10-Core outperforms Core 5 320 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 750 | 1092 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.04 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 16 April 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $340 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 7.3 MB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | 40000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | W | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Pro 10-Core and Core 5 320.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.70 | 8.69 |
| Recency | 17 January 2023 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 10 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core has a 46% higher aggregate performance score, and 67% more physical cores and 67% more threads.
Core 5 320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 5 320 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
