Ryzen 7 249 vs Apple M2 Max
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 249 outperforms M2 Max by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 603 | 538 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 8.20 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Hawk Point-H (Zen 4) (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 2 June 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M2 Max and Ryzen 7 249: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 3.3 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 48 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 67000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Max and Ryzen 7 249 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 79 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Max and Ryzen 7 249. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Max and Ryzen 7 249. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.67 | 16.66 |
| Recency | 17 January 2023 | 2 June 2026 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Apple M2 Max has 33% more physical cores.
Ryzen 7 249, on the other hand, has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M2 Max and AMD Ryzen 7 249.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
