EPYC 9355 vs Apple M2 Max

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency20.10no data
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,694

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache3.3 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache36 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors67000 Million66,520 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 Max 38-Core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 280 Watt

Apple M2 Max has 254.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M2 Max is a notebook processor while EPYC 9355 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Max and EPYC 9355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Max
M2 Max
AMD EPYC 9355
EPYC 9355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 233 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 Max or EPYC 9355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.