Xeon w5-3525 vs Apple M1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.12
Xeon w5-3525
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 290 Watt
30.66
+499%

Xeon w5-3525 outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 499% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1257149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.58
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data10.11
DesignerAppleIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M1 and Xeon w5-3525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data16
Threads832
Base clock speed2.064 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB45 MB
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors16000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on M1 and Xeon w5-3525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 and Xeon w5-3525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

M1 and Xeon w5-3525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 and Xeon w5-3525 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 and Xeon w5-3525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 8-Core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 and Xeon w5-3525.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M1 5.12
Xeon w5-3525 30.66
+499%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M1 8207
Xeon w5-3525 49190
+499%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.12 30.66
Recency 10 November 2020 24 August 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32

Xeon w5-3525 has a 498.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon w5-3525 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 is a notebook processor while Xeon w5-3525 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1
M1
Intel Xeon w5-3525
Xeon w5-3525

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2324 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-3525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M1 and Xeon w5-3525, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.