Xeon Gold 6314U vs Apple M1
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6314U outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1206 | 139 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.96 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 48 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 8-Core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.17 | 30.23 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 32 |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Apple M1 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Gold 6314U, on the other hand, has a 484.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
The Xeon Gold 6314U is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M1 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6314U is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and Xeon Gold 6314U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
