Xeon 6369P vs Apple M1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.10
Xeon 6369P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.46
+262%

Xeon 6369P outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1328377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data18.73
DesignerAppleIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

M1 and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.064 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Number of transistors16000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on M1 and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1700
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

M1 and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 8-Core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 and Xeon 6369P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M1 5.10
Xeon 6369P 18.46
+262%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M1 8207
Xeon 6369P 29680
+262%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.10 18.46
Recency 10 November 2020 24 February 2025
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm

Apple M1 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6369P, on the other hand, has a 262% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6369P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6369P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1
M1
Intel Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2354 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6369P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M1 and Xeon 6369P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.