EPYC 9175F vs Apple M1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.12
EPYC 9175F
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
41.01
+701%

EPYC 9175F outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 701% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking131472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.47
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data12.29
DesignerAppleAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

M1 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.064 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data16x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors16000 Million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on M1 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 8-Core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M1 5.12
EPYC 9175F 41.01
+701%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M1 8207
EPYC 9175F 65792
+702%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.12 41.01
Recency 10 November 2020 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9175F has a 701% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9175F is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1
M1
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2345 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M1 and EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.