Core Ultra 7 164U vs Apple M1
Aggregate performance score
Ultra 7 164U outperforms Apple M1 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1158 | 764 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | no data | Meteor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 2551 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M1 8-Core GPU | Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.31 | 9.77 |
| Integrated graphics card | 14.09 | 9.71 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 8 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Apple M1 has 45.1% faster integrated GPU, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, has a 84% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 50% more physical cores and 75% more threads.
The Core Ultra 7 164U is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
