Xeon E7-4860 vs Apple M1 Pro
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 953 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M-Series | Intel Xeon E7 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Westmere-EX (2011) |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) | 3 April 2011 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,838 |
Detailed specifications
M1 Pro and Xeon E7-4860 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 17 |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 513 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | 2,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M1 Pro and Xeon E7-4860 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | LGA1567 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | W | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Pro and Xeon E7-4860. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
M1 Pro and Xeon E7-4860 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Pro and Xeon E7-4860 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Pro and Xeon E7-4860. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.113 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 3 April 2011 |
| Threads | 10 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
Apple M1 Pro has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7-4860, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro and Intel Xeon E7-4860. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-4860 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
