Xeon 5080 vs Apple M1 Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking917not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
DesignerAppleIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataDempsey (2006)
Release date18 October 2021 (4 years ago)23 May 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$851

Detailed specifications

M1 Pro and Xeon 5080 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads104
Base clock speed2.064 GHz3.73 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz0.07 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB16 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors33700 Million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on M1 Pro and Xeon 5080 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataPLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)28 MB + 24 MB130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Pro and Xeon 5080. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

M1 Pro and Xeon 5080 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Pro and Xeon 5080 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Pro and Xeon 5080. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 October 2021 23 May 2006
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 10 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 130 Watt

Apple M1 Pro has an age advantage of 15 years, 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro and Intel Xeon 5080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while Xeon 5080 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
Intel Xeon 5080
Xeon 5080

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 512 votes

Rate M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Xeon 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M1 Pro and Xeon 5080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.