i7-2630QM vs Apple M1 Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
11.72
+410%

Apple M1 Pro outperforms i7-2630QM by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6501773
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-SeriesIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date18 October 2021 (2 years ago)3 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$378

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads108
Base clock speed2.064 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache2.9 MB256 KB
L2 cache28 MB1 MB
L3 cache24 MB6 MB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data216 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33700 Million1160 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCPGA988,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Pro 11.72
+410%
i7-2630QM 2.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Pro 17177
+384%
i7-2630QM 3552

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.72 2.30
Recency 18 October 2021 3 January 2011
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 10 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm

Apple M1 Pro has a 409.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2630QM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Core i7-2630QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
Intel Core i7-2630QM
Core i7-2630QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 381 vote

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 480 votes

Rate Core i7-2630QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Pro or Core i7-2630QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.