Core Ultra 7 165U vs Apple M1 Pro
Aggregated performance score
Apple M1 Pro outperforms Core Ultra 7 165U by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 599 | 604 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | no data | Meteor Lake-P |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (2 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | $11.95 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 96 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | Intel® Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 2 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
| PCI support | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Apple M1 Pro outperforms Core Ultra 7 165U by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Apple M1 Pro by 6% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.79 | 11.72 |
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 12 |
| Threads | 10 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
