Celeron 2.0 vs Apple M1 Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking919not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataNorthwood (2002−2004)
Release date18 October 2021 (4 years ago)September 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M1 Pro and Celeron 2.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads101
Base clock speed2.064 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB8 KB
L2 cache28 MB128 KB
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data146 mm2
Number of transistors33700 Million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M1 Pro and Celeron 2.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data478
Power consumption (TDP)28 MB + 24 MB73 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Pro and Celeron 2.0. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 10 1
Threads 10 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 73 Watt

Apple M1 Pro has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 2500% more advanced lithography process, and 160.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro and Intel Celeron 2.0. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.0 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
Intel Celeron 2.0
Celeron 2.0

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 512 votes

Rate M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Celeron 2.0 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M1 Pro and Celeron 2.0, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.