Apple M2 Pro vs Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Primary details
Comparing Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 543 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | Apple Apple M-Series |
Architecture codename | Cortex-M4F | no data |
Release date | no data | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.424 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1/1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 3.3 MB |
L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 24 MB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M2 Pro has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Apple M2 Pro. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.