Xeon 6972P vs Am486SX-33

VS

Primary details

Comparing Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Am486no data
Architecture codename80486 (1989)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threadsno data192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1no data
L1 cache8 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data480 MB (shared)
Chip lithography700 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors1 Millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno data7529
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Chip lithography 700 nm 5 nm

Xeon 6972P has 9500% more physical cores, and a 13900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Am486SX-33 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6972P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Am486SX-33 and Xeon 6972P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Am486SX-33
Am486SX-33
Intel Xeon 6972P
Xeon 6972P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Am486SX-33 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6972P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Am486SX-33 or Xeon 6972P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.