EPYC 9655P vs Am486DX2-80

VS

Primary details

Comparing Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Am486, i486no data
Power efficiencyno data23.54
Architecture codename80486 (1989)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threadsno data192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.08 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate40 MT/sno data
Multiplier2no data
L1 cache8 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography500 nm4 nm
Die size198.025 44.5 × 44.5 mm12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1 Million99,780 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Chip lithography 500 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9655P has 9500% more physical cores, and a 12400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Am486DX2-80 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Am486DX2-80 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Am486DX2-80
Am486DX2-80
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Am486DX2-80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 171 vote

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Am486DX2-80 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.