Apple M4 (8 cores) vs AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR

VS

Primary details

Comparing AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR and M4 (8 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD K6Apple M4
Architecture codenameK6 (1997)no data
Release date2 April 1997 (27 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR and M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate66.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier3no data
Chip lithography350 nm3 nm
Die size162 mm2no data
Number of transistors9 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR and M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)no data5 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR and M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 8-core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 1997 28 October 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 350 nm 3 nm

Apple M4 (8 cores) has an age advantage of 27 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 11566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR and M4 (8 cores). We've got no test results to judge.

Note that AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR is a desktop processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR and Apple M4 (8 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR
AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR
Apple M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate M4 (8 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about AMD-K6/PR2-200ALR or M4 (8 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.