EPYC 9015 vs AMD-K5-PR133ABR

VS

Primary details

Comparing AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD K5no data
Architecture codenameK5 (1996−1997)Turin (2024)
Release date7 October 1996 (28 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527

Detailed specifications

AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate66.666 MT/sno data
Multiplier1.5no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography350 nm4 nm
Die size181 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4 Million16,630 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 1996 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 350 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9015 has an age advantage of 28 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 8650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that AMD-K5-PR133ABR is a desktop processor while EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between AMD-K5-PR133ABR and EPYC 9015, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD AMD-K5-PR133ABR
AMD-K5-PR133ABR
AMD EPYC 9015
EPYC 9015

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate AMD-K5-PR133ABR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9015 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about AMD-K5-PR133ABR or EPYC 9015, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.