Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs A9-9430 SoC
Primary details
Comparing A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 495 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 48.77 |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT4 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R5 | AMD Radeon 880M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
A9-9430 SoC has -87.5% more threads, and 12% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9430 SoC and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
