EPYC 9275F vs A9-9430 SoC
Primary details
Comparing A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,439 |
Detailed specifications
A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FT4 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R5 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 320 Watt |
A9-9430 SoC has 1180% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A9-9430 SoC is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9430 SoC and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
