Ryzen 3 3250U vs A9-9420e

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.70
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
+243%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms A9-9420e by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27041768
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency4.4215.14
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size124.5 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420e 0.70
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+243%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9420e 1107
Ryzen 3 3250U 3805
+244%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A9-9420e 97
Ryzen 3 3250U 353
+264%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 2.40
Integrated graphics card 1.48 2.98
Recency 1 June 2018 6 January 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

Ryzen 3 3250U has a 242.9% higher aggregate performance score, 101.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420e and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 149 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2117 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420e or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.