Athlon 64 3800+ (F3) vs A9-9400 SoC
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Orleans (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (9 years ago) | February 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A9-9400 SoC and Athlon 64 3800+ (F3) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 128K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 103.1 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A9-9400 SoC and Athlon 64 3800+ (F3) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT4 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 59 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9400 SoC and Athlon 64 3800+ (F3). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9400 SoC and Athlon 64 3800+ (F3) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9400 SoC and Athlon 64 3800+ (F3). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R5 3CU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9400 SoC and Athlon 64 3800+ (F3).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 59 Watt |
A9-9400 SoC has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 490% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD A9-9400 SoC and AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (F3). We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
