Ultra 5 245KF vs A8 PRO-7600B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8 PRO-7600B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.86
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.61
+1384%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms A8 PRO-7600B by a whopping 1384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1996177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.7120.90
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads414
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size245 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+1851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8 PRO-7600B 1.86
Ultra 5 245KF 27.61
+1384%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8 PRO-7600B 2962
Ultra 5 245KF 43853
+1381%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 27.61
Recency 31 July 2014 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 14
Threads 4 14
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

A8 PRO-7600B has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 1384.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the A8 PRO-7600B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8 PRO-7600B and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8 PRO-7600B
A8 PRO-7600B
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 152 votes

Rate A8 PRO-7600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8 PRO-7600B or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.