EPYC 7373X vs A8-9600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1880not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.03no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Milan-X (2022)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$78no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size250 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 22 March 2022
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 240 Watt

A8-9600 has 269.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-9600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-9600 and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-9600
A8-9600
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 975 votes

Rate A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-9600 or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.