Core i3-3250 vs A8-9600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-9600
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.14
+35.4%

A8-9600 outperforms Core i3-3250 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17671996
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.130.09
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$78no data
Current price$30 (0.4x MSRP)$260

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-9600 has 15600% better value for money than i3-3250.

Detailed specifications

A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C65 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-9600 and Core i3-3250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
FDIno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protectionno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-9600 and Core i3-3250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 2500
iGPU core count6no data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-9600 and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-9600 and Core i3-3250.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-9600 2.14
+35.4%
i3-3250 1.58

A8-9600 outperforms Core i3-3250 by 35% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-9600 3303
+35.2%
i3-3250 2443

A8-9600 outperforms Core i3-3250 by 35% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-9600 605
+11%
i3-3250 545

A8-9600 outperforms Core i3-3250 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-9600 1478
+28.2%
i3-3250 1153

A8-9600 outperforms Core i3-3250 by 28% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 1.58
Recency 27 July 2017 1 April 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

The A8-9600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-9600 and Core i3-3250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-9600
A8-9600
Intel Core i3-3250
Core i3-3250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 912 votes

Rate A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 186 votes

Rate Core i3-3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-9600 or Core i3-3250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.