A6-9200 SoC vs A8-9600
Primary details
Comparing A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1878 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.13 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 3.03 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $78 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 250 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Radeon R4 2CU |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 27 July 2017 | 31 May 2016 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
A8-9600 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
A6-9200 SoC, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A8-9600 is a desktop processor while A6-9200 SoC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-9600 and A6-9200 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.