Celeron N6211 vs A8-8600P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-8600P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.55
+9.9%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

A8-8600P outperforms Celeron N6211 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-8600P and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21302212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD CarrizoElkhart Lake
Power efficiency4.1920.53
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-8600P and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C70 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-8600P and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-8600P and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-8600P and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-8600P and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-8600P and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-8600P and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-8600P and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-8600P 1.55
+9.9%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-8600P 2464
+9.8%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.41
Recency 3 June 2015 17 July 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 6 Watt

A8-8600P has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-8600P and Celeron N6211.

Be aware that A8-8600P is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-8600P and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-8600P
A8-8600P
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate A8-8600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-8600P or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.