A10-5757M vs A8-7670K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7670K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.06
+3.5%

A8-7670K outperforms A10-5757M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7670K and A10-5757M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17951826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date20 July 2015 (8 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$70 $300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7670K and A10-5757M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C71 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-7670K and A10-5757M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FP2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7670K and A10-5757M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7670K and A10-5757M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7670K and A10-5757M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8650G
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7670K and A10-5757M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7670K and A10-5757M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7670K and A10-5757M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7670K 2.06
+3.5%
A10-5757M 1.99

A8-7670K outperforms A10-5757M by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-7670K 3192
+3.5%
A10-5757M 3084

A8-7670K outperforms A10-5757M by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 1.99
Recency 20 July 2015 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-7670K and A10-5757M.

Note that A8-7670K is a desktop processor while A10-5757M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7670K and A10-5757M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7670K
A8-7670K
AMD A10-5757M
A10-5757M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate A8-7670K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 43 votes

Rate A10-5757M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7670K or A10-5757M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.