EPYC 4124P vs A8-7600

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7600
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.03
EPYC 4124P
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
11.73
+478%

EPYC 4124P outperforms A8-7600 by a whopping 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1923667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.71
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.9617.08
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size245 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million6,570 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7600 2.03
EPYC 4124P 11.73
+478%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7600 3217
EPYC 4124P 18637
+479%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 11.73
Recency 31 July 2014 21 May 2024
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

EPYC 4124P has a 477.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4124P is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7600 in performance tests.

Note that A8-7600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4124P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7600 and EPYC 4124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7600
A8-7600
AMD EPYC 4124P
EPYC 4124P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 334 votes

Rate A8-7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7600 or EPYC 4124P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.